Aceasta este o întrebare despre cum să utilizați bibtex pentru a cita o preimprimare din Arxiv. Să presupunem că am:
@ARTICLE{BM:1999, AUTHOR = {First, Author AND Second, Author}, TITLE = {The title of this article}, YEAR = {2035}, JOURNAL = What exactly do I put here?, VOLUME = {}, NUMBER = {}, PAGES = {} }
Unde mai exact pun codul articolului în arxiv? Să presupunem că codul este arXiv: 1234: 5678v1
Folosesc
\bibliographystyle{alpha} % (uses file "plain.bst")amsplain \bibliography{myrefs} % expects file "myrefs.bib"
* EDIT: * De fapt există o intrare BibTeX care este @unpublished
care este cea pe care o folosesc. Nu am observat și am pus @article
în exemplul de mai sus. Are câmpuri: autor, titlu, notă, lună, an și cheie. Deci, întrebarea este mai mult despre dacă trebuie pus codul arxiv al articolului în notă sau în cheie.
Comentarii
- Acest lucru mi se pare destul de off-topic: it ‘ s despre stilul casei AMS mai mult decât (La) TeX sau BibTeX
- Un început bun ar putea fi următorul script I ‘ tocmai creat: creează automat intrarea BibTeX din arXiv (și sursă phky php )
Răspuns
De asemenea, merită menționat Biblatex, care are suport adecvat pentru eprints cu toate stilurile. Pentru arXiv, în mod specific, puteți utiliza
archivePrefix = {arXiv}, eprint = {0902.0885}, primaryClass = {quant-ph},
for a new-style eprint, or
archivePrefix = {arXiv}, eprint = {quant-ph/0401062},
for an old-style eprint.
Both entries were taken directly from the NASA ADS database, clicking on „Export”. The journal
field you left empty, except of course if has actually been published elsewhere. As for the template, it depends on the style you are using. I use @article
with the style biblatex-phys
, and the formatting is good, but with the default style it produces crap if journal
is empty. In this case you can use @misc
and @online
, with similar results. You should avoid @unpublished
, however, as it hides the eprint number.
EDIT: Updated to take into account the comments.
Comments
- I disagree that the formatting as
@article
is good. You get something of the form... In: (2015)
if you omit thejournal
field, which looks strange… - Yeah the missing „in” is really odd.
- Unfortunately arXiv itself is still using texlive 2011 which is completely incompatible with the version of biblatex in texlive 2016.
- I would advise to use the
@misc
type, as it officially allows the fieldseprint
,eprintclass
, andeprinttype
, as opposed to@unpublished
, and@online
.@article
requiresjournaltitle
, as @Jonathan pointed out. See biblatex documentation (2.1 Entry Types and 3.12. Electronic Publishing Information) - anyone else experience that archivePrefix in one bibtex entry makes the hidden links in the pdf ALL get prefixed by the value of archivePrefix (ie arxiv.org)? This is using apsrev-title.bst
Answer
This is what I do
- Go to arXiv site: e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9503002
- Click NASA ADS link under References and Citations e.g. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/arXiv:q-alg%2F9503002
- On the left, click „Export Citation” e.g. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995JMP….36.6073B/exportcitation
- Click „Copy to clipboard” and paste it into your bibtex file
- (Optional) Check for the most common mistakes in automatically created bib entries Software-generated bibliographic entries: common errors and other mistakes to check before use
Comments
- This is ridiculously useful, I wish I knew about this before…
- May I suggest a 6th step?
6. Check the for the most common mistakes in automatically created bib entries, see https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/386053/36296
- Now after the NASA ADS link, you can go to „Export” tab on the left and choose BibTex
Answer
General arXiv citations are explained in the arXiv help. The correct citation format depends on whether it is an „old style” arXiv reference (eg arXiv:hep-ph/9609357) or „new style” (eg arXiv:0807.2882 [cond-mat.mes-hall]).
The REVTeX4.1 bibstyles also support arXiv references.
AMS styles, I can”t help….
Comments
- +1 for
eprint
, that’s as much of a standard as I’ve ever seen. If the AMS styles don’t use it, then that’s an AMS-specific issue. You can modify the Bibtex style to include the eprint field if it’s important to you. - Neither
eprint
norurl
are standard fields in the current BibTeX. You can’t hardly fault a style for not implementing a non-standard field. (Though I thought I heard a rumour here that the next version of BibTeX will have proper support of electronic documents.) - Just a comment on David Zaskavsky’s comment: There is a lovely little script called
urlbst
that adds support for theeprint
andurl
fields (and various other kinds of web link e.g. DOI’s and PubMed) to an existing bst file. It works fine on the AMS styles. - The link to the help is invalid now
Answer
I usually leave journal
blank, or put in the word „pre-print”. The arXiv information I usually put in note
, since the AMS styles ignore the eprint
field. When I get less lazy I sometimes use, instead of the @article
document type, @misc
.
Comments
- This more like what I was asking. Now, it would be good to know if this is standard and even more if AMS has some guideline in this case.
- Actually there is a bibtex entry that is @unpublished which is the one I am using. I didn’t noticed and I put @article in the example above. It has fields: author, title, note, month, year and key. So the question is more about whether to put the arxiv code of the article in note or in key.
- Nevermind. Key is a field that is ignored and not printed, so it can not be there. Then I think it should be in NOTE as you said.
- What exactly should be in the note field? The full URL or just the arXiv id?
- @ErelSegalHalevi: there is no „should”, since I don’t think it is standardized. But I generally just put the arXiv id such as
arXiv:gr-qc/XXXXXXX
orarXiv:XXXX.XXXX
Remember, absent an actual style guide from a journal, the main goal of the bibliography is to make the references findable by readers. The arXiv id (properly formatted) is sufficient to uniquely identify a pre-print, so it is generally good enough.
Answer
DBLP, which generally produces good BibTeX files, formats an archive entry as:
@article{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-1207-0016, author = {Ruchen Duan Yingbin Liang}, title = {Bounds and Capacity Theorems for Cognitive Interference Channels with State}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1207.0016}, year = {2012}, ee = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0016}, bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de} }
(http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/journals/corr/abs-1207-0016)
Comentarii
- Acest format nu respectă liniile directoare date pe arxiv.org și am câștigat ‘ nu înțelegeți personal referința dacă adresa URL nu este afișată.
Răspuns
Pentru compilarea listei mele de publicații, folosesc intrarea bibtex pe care Spires o oferă pentru fiecare înregistrare. Puteți căuta autorul și data pentru a găsi intrarea Spires.
Răspuns
@misc
este cea mai bună soluție. Trebuie doar să specificați archivePrefix="arXiv"
și eprint
id, ca în răspunsul lui Mateus.
@article
afișează un câmp gol In:
și @unpublished
nu afișează un ID arXiv, dar afișează autorul, titlul, anul și ID-ul arXiv.
Răspuns
O extensie Chrome numită „Bibliotecar” din Biblioteca Fermat poate extrage citația în format BibTeX direct din arXiv: