Dit is een vraag over hoe je bibtex gebruikt om een voordruk van Arxiv aan te halen. Stel dat ik heb:
@ARTICLE{BM:1999, AUTHOR = {First, Author AND Second, Author}, TITLE = {The title of this article}, YEAR = {2035}, JOURNAL = What exactly do I put here?, VOLUME = {}, NUMBER = {}, PAGES = {} }
Waar moet ik de code van het artikel precies in arxiv plaatsen? Stel dat de code arXiv: 1234: 5678v1
ik gebruik
\bibliographystyle{alpha} % (uses file "plain.bst")amsplain \bibliography{myrefs} % expects file "myrefs.bib"
* EDIT: * eigenlijk er is een BibTeX-vermelding die @unpublished
is en die ik gebruik. Ik heb het niet gemerkt en ik heb @article
in het bovenstaande voorbeeld gezet. Het bevat velden: auteur, titel, opmerking, maand, jaar en sleutel. De vraag is dus meer of je de arxiv-code van het artikel in noot of in sleutel.
Reacties
- Dit lijkt mij nogal off-topic: it ‘ s over AMS-huisstijl meer dan (La) TeX of BibTeX
- Een goed begin zou het volgende script kunnen zijn I ‘ heb net aangemaakt: automatisch BibTeX-item maken vanuit arXiv (en hacky php-bron )
Antwoord
Het is ook de moeite waard om Biblatex te noemen, die de juiste ondersteuning heeft voor e-prints met alle stijlen. Specifiek voor arXiv kunt u
archivePrefix = {arXiv}, eprint = {0902.0885}, primaryClass = {quant-ph},
for a new-style eprint, or
archivePrefix = {arXiv}, eprint = {quant-ph/0401062},
for an old-style eprint.
Both entries were taken directly from the NASA ADS database, clicking on “Export”. The journal
field you left empty, except of course if has actually been published elsewhere. As for the template, it depends on the style you are using. I use @article
with the style biblatex-phys
, and the formatting is good, but with the default style it produces crap if journal
is empty. In this case you can use @misc
and @online
, with similar results. You should avoid @unpublished
, however, as it hides the eprint number.
EDIT: Updated to take into account the comments.
Comments
- I disagree that the formatting as
@article
is good. You get something of the form... In: (2015)
if you omit thejournal
field, which looks strange… - Yeah the missing “in” is really odd.
- Unfortunately arXiv itself is still using texlive 2011 which is completely incompatible with the version of biblatex in texlive 2016.
- I would advise to use the
@misc
type, as it officially allows the fieldseprint
,eprintclass
, andeprinttype
, as opposed to@unpublished
, and@online
.@article
requiresjournaltitle
, as @Jonathan pointed out. See biblatex documentation (2.1 Entry Types and 3.12. Electronic Publishing Information) - anyone else experience that archivePrefix in one bibtex entry makes the hidden links in the pdf ALL get prefixed by the value of archivePrefix (ie arxiv.org)? This is using apsrev-title.bst
Answer
This is what I do
- Go to arXiv site: e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9503002
- Click NASA ADS link under References and Citations e.g. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/arXiv:q-alg%2F9503002
- On the left, click “Export Citation” e.g. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995JMP….36.6073B/exportcitation
- Click “Copy to clipboard” and paste it into your bibtex file
- (Optional) Check for the most common mistakes in automatically created bib entries Software-generated bibliographic entries: common errors and other mistakes to check before use
Comments
- This is ridiculously useful, I wish I knew about this before…
- May I suggest a 6th step?
6. Check the for the most common mistakes in automatically created bib entries, see https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/386053/36296
- Now after the NASA ADS link, you can go to “Export” tab on the left and choose BibTex
Answer
General arXiv citations are explained in the arXiv help. The correct citation format depends on whether it is an “old style” arXiv reference (eg arXiv:hep-ph/9609357) or “new style” (eg arXiv:0807.2882 [cond-mat.mes-hall]).
The REVTeX4.1 bibstyles also support arXiv references.
AMS styles, I can”t help….
Comments
- +1 for
eprint
, that’s as much of a standard as I’ve ever seen. If the AMS styles don’t use it, then that’s an AMS-specific issue. You can modify the Bibtex style to include the eprint field if it’s important to you. - Neither
eprint
norurl
are standard fields in the current BibTeX. You can’t hardly fault a style for not implementing a non-standard field. (Though I thought I heard a rumour here that the next version of BibTeX will have proper support of electronic documents.) - Just a comment on David Zaskavsky’s comment: There is a lovely little script called
urlbst
that adds support for theeprint
andurl
fields (and various other kinds of web link e.g. DOI’s and PubMed) to an existing bst file. It works fine on the AMS styles. - The link to the help is invalid now
Answer
I usually leave journal
blank, or put in the word “pre-print”. The arXiv information I usually put in note
, since the AMS styles ignore the eprint
field. When I get less lazy I sometimes use, instead of the @article
document type, @misc
.
Comments
- This more like what I was asking. Now, it would be good to know if this is standard and even more if AMS has some guideline in this case.
- Actually there is a bibtex entry that is @unpublished which is the one I am using. I didn’t noticed and I put @article in the example above. It has fields: author, title, note, month, year and key. So the question is more about whether to put the arxiv code of the article in note or in key.
- Nevermind. Key is a field that is ignored and not printed, so it can not be there. Then I think it should be in NOTE as you said.
- What exactly should be in the note field? The full URL or just the arXiv id?
- @ErelSegalHalevi: there is no “should”, since I don’t think it is standardized. But I generally just put the arXiv id such as
arXiv:gr-qc/XXXXXXX
orarXiv:XXXX.XXXX
Remember, absent an actual style guide from a journal, the main goal of the bibliography is to make the references findable by readers. The arXiv id (properly formatted) is sufficient to uniquely identify a pre-print, so it is generally good enough.
Answer
DBLP, which generally produces good BibTeX files, formats an archive entry as:
@article{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-1207-0016, author = {Ruchen Duan Yingbin Liang}, title = {Bounds and Capacity Theorems for Cognitive Interference Channels with State}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1207.0016}, year = {2012}, ee = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0016}, bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de} }
(http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/journals/corr/abs-1207-0016)
Opmerkingen
- Dit formaat volgt niet de richtlijn die wordt gegeven op arxiv.org , en ik heb ‘ begrijp de referentie niet persoonlijk als de URL niet wordt getoond.
Answer
Voor het samenstellen van mijn publicatielijst gebruik ik het bibtex-item dat Spires voor elk record geeft. U kunt de auteur en de datum zoeken om de vermelding van Spires te vinden.
Antwoord
@misc
is de beste oplossing. Specificeer gewoon archivePrefix="arXiv"
, en de eprint
id, zoals in het antwoord van Mateus.
@article
toont een leeg In:
veld, en @unpublished
toont geen arXiv-id, maar @misc
toont auteur, titel, jaar en arXiv-ID.
Antwoord
Een Chrome-extensie genaamd “Librarian” uit de bibliotheek van Fermat kan citaten in BibTeX-indeling rechtstreeks uit arXiv halen: